Improvement of Endoscopic Reports with Implementation of a Dictation Template.

AIMS: Completeness of procedure reports is an important quality indicator in endoscopy. A dictation template was developed to ensure key elements were included in colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) reports. Endoscopy reports were reviewed prior to and following implementation of the dictation templates to determine whether report completeness improved. METHODS: Key elements in an endoscopic report were identified from published guidelines and posted at dictation stations. Colonoscopy and EGD reports were reviewed for the nine physicians performing endoscopy at St. Paul's Hospital prior to and following implementation of dictation templates. Dictation completeness was defined as inclusion of all key elements. Dictation completeness and inclusion of individual key elements at the two time points were compared using the t-test and Chi-square test. RESULTS: Reports for 4648 procedures undertaken by nine endoscopists were reviewed for completeness at each time point (2008 and 2014). Colonoscopy report completeness increased from 65.8% to 83.2% (P < 0.001). Items that improved included documentation of consent, endoscope used, complications, withdrawal time and rectal retroflexion. EGD report completeness increased from 72.7% to 77.3% (P < 0.001) with improvement in documentation of consent and complications. Items consistently underreported for colonoscopy and EGD at both time points included: patient age, comorbidities, current medications and patient comfort. CONCLUSION: There was an association between the use of a posted dictation template at dictation stations and the improved completeness of endoscopic reports.

Variations in practice patterns for adult cancer patients on home parenteral nutrition in Canada.

OBJECTIVES: Cancer has become a major indication for home parenteral nutrition (HPN). However, the use of HPN in adult cancer patients is highly variable between countries and may also differ within each country. The aim of the present study was to characterize regional variations in practice patterns for cancer patients on HPN using data from the Canadian HPN Registry. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included all cancer patients (n = 164) enrolled in the registry from 2005 to 2016. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics were described. Differences in baseline characteristics were evaluated by province and duration of HPN therapy. Survival was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared among different tumor types and provinces using the log-rank test. RESULTS: The most common tumors were gastrointestinal (54.2%) and gynecologic (31.8%). Most patients were from the provinces of Ontario (54.3%) and Alberta (41.5%). Patients who received HPN for ≥3 mo (64.6%) had a higher baseline Karnofsky Performance Status (80 versus 50) and albumin (35 versus 26 mmol/L) compared with those on HPN for <3 mo. There were no differences in survival based on tumor category. Patients in Ontario programs had a longer median survival (11.3 versus 7.1 mo) and higher proportion of secondary indications for HPN relative to patients in Alberta programs. CONCLUSIONS: Most cancer patients on HPN have gastrointestinal or gynecologic cancers. Those surviving for ≥3 mo have better baseline characteristics. Regional variability in the prevalence, selection, and survival of cancer patients receiving HPN suggests the need for consensus on the use of HPN in this population.

Changes in Home Parenteral Nutrition Practice Based on the Canadian Home Parenteral Nutrition Patient Registry.

BACKGROUND: Since 2005, the Canadian home parenteral nutrition (HPN) registry has collected data on patients' demography, outcomes, and HPN clinical practice. At annual meetings, Canadian HPN programs review and discuss results. AIM: To evaluate changes over time in patient demography, outcomes, and HPN clinical practice using the registry data. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated 369 patients who were prospectively entered in the registry. Two periods were compared for the first data entry: 2005-2008 (n = 182) and 2011-2014 (n = 187). Patient demography, indications for HPN, HPN regimen, nutrition assessment, vascular access, and number of line sepsis per 1000 catheter days were evaluated. RESULTS: For 2011-2014 compared with 2005-2008, indications for HPN changed significantly, with an increased proportion of patients with cancer (37.9% vs 16.7%) and with fewer cases of short bowel syndrome (32% vs 65.5%); line sepsis rate decreased from 1.58 to 0.97 per 1000 catheter days; and the use of tunneled catheters decreased from 64.3% to 38.0% and was no longer the most frequently chosen vascular access method. In contrast, the proportion of peripherally inserted central catheters increased from 21.6% to 52.9%. In addition, there was a reduction in number and days of hospitalizations related to HPN, and favorable changes were noted in the prescription of energy, proteins, and trace elements. CONCLUSION: The Canadian HPN registry is useful in tracking trends in demography, outcomes, and clinical practice. Results suggest a shift in patient demography and line access with improvement in line sepsis, hospitalizations, and HPN prescriptions.

Recommendations for the appropriate use of anti-inflammatory drugs in the era of the coxibs: defining the role of gastroprotective agents.

Treatment with anti-inflammatory drugs and the analgesic efficacy of conventional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are compromised by a two- to fourfold increased risk of gastrointestinal complications. This increased risk has resulted in an increasing use of the new selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors or coxibs, which, in clinical trials and outcomes studies, reduced gastrointestinal adverse events by 50% to 65% compared with conventional NSAIDs. However, the coxibs are not available to all patients who need them, and NSAIDs are still widely used. Moreover, treatment with a coxib cannot heal pre-existing gastrointestinal lesions, and cotherapy with an anti-secretory drug or mucosal protective agent may be required. This paper addresses the management of patients with risk factors for gastrointestinal complications who are taking NSAIDs and makes recommendations for the appropriate use of 'gastroprotective' agents (GPAs) in patients who need to take an NSAID or a coxib. When economically possible, a coxib alone is preferable to a conventional NSAID plus a GPA to minimize exposure to potential gastrointestinal damage and avoid unnecessary dual therapy. Patients at high risk require a GPA in addition to a coxib.